So I’m hungover this morning, and the reasons why are really quite irrelevant at this point, as it’s nearly three in the afternoon and I’m back into my pajamas for the second time today. In my drug-addled lethargy, I opened my laptop to try to get some work done, and decided to put a movie on in “the background.” Most people I know do this fairly regularly. For some reason it makes you feel like less of an oxygen-waster to have DVD plugged in rather than just turning on the television. It’s nice. It really helps me balance my day. It’s a distraction from whatever tedium you’re trying to work through. You can tell yourself: “I’m going to plug in Braveheart and work/study/clean throughout the whole thing.” Bam. Two VHS cassette tapes later and you’ve spent a good three hours getting shit done. So what characterizes a good background film?
You need a film that you can not pay attention to for a good ten, fifteen minutes at a time, and then tune into again and know exactly what’s what and who’s who and why the hell they’re doing whatever they’re doing. This familiarity is essential: whether it be because you’ve seen the film a million times; it’s full of familiar tropes and cliches and conventions; or, it’s so slow-paced that a single event takes a good ten, fifteen minutes to occur. So, these are my top ten background films… please tell me yours in the comments!
10. Once Upon a Time in the West
Sergio Leone’s pinnacle western pits black hat Henry Fonda against white hat Charles Bronson. While to call this a simple film does not do it justice, but as long as you know Fonda = bad, Bronson = good, you could probably jump in at any point and enjoy the movie. While brimming deliciously with tension, the film still crawls at the pace of a geriatric snail, so the odds are, if you’ve seen it at least once before, you’re golden.
Best background for: Writing your master’s dissertation on the notions of traditionally masculine archetypes in Italian/American cinema.
Worst background for: Reading The Grapes of Wrath.
9. Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
If following any kind of plot is important to you, it’s really quite essential that you be familiar with Hitchhiker’s – whether through the books, the radio shows, the original BBC sitcom, or at least own a towel – before you attempt to tune out for half of it. If plot doesn’t matter, that’s great because this is so ridiculous it’s actually kind of the point.
Best background for: Drawing that graphic novel about a OCD space alien stranded on a post-apocalyptic, disease-infested planet Earth you’ve been working on for the last seven years.
Worst background for: Studying for a physics exam.
8. The Goonies
The Goonies succeeds as a great background movie because it is such a familiar story with such a simple structure. What plot points do you need to know? The kids are after treasure. Bad guys are after them. The fat kid is funny. Done.
Best background for: Making a scrapbook for an old childhood friend (aw).
Worst background for: Canvassing donations for the Special Olympics.
7. any Harry Potter movie
Again, even if you’re a newly arrived visitor to this planet, it’s pretty easy to get emotionally involved in each scene, because it’s pretty clear who Harry’s enemies are. Hint: if someone in one of these movies looks evil, they probably are.
Best background for: Playing some kind of RPG.
Worst background for: Writing next Sunday’s sermon.
6. Underworld Trilogy
Before we got the Stephanie Meyers’ Vampires vs Werewolf debacle, there was Underworld, which did the whole thing so much better. They’re not good movies per say, and the declining quality was sadly predictable, but they were fun and just oh-so-campy.
Best background for: Trolling Twilight message boards and giving your two cents on the bestiality vs necrophilia debate.
Worst background for: Actively contributing to Twilight message boards and lobbying hard for Team Jacob / Edward.
5. Stardust
This hugely underrated fairy tale is so absurdly adorable that it might just be too distracting if you’re trying to get anything important done. The parade of great performances and famous faces keeps pulling your attention and the fantastical mise en scenes and endearing characters keep it. As a disclaimer, you do need to see it many times before you can start tuning things out.
Best background for: Sewing that Halloween costume that will, like, totally win you the Prettiest-Princess-at-the-Ball prize.
Worst background for: Blogging about how Robert DeNiro is the biggest, baddest mofo out there.
4. Some Like it Hot
A comedy of errors and mistaken identities to do Shakespeare proud, Some Like it Hot is arguably one of the best comedies ever made, plus it has Marilyn Monroe. It’s a pretty easy premise. Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis are disguising themselves as women to stay on the run from some Chicago gangsters, but then they meet Marilyn Monroe and both want to get in her pants. Who wouldn’t? Let the laughs ensue. Any moment that you might look up from your book will be a good one.
Best background for: Giving your sexuality a long, concentrated pondering.
Worst background for: Working on your comedic gender-bending screenplay. You will never beat this. Ever. And that realization will crush your soul.
3. Hot Fuzz
Hot Fuzz is so extremely engrossing that, repeated viewings later, I am still enthralled and give it my full attention. There’s just so much delicious stuff there. But, on that same token, I could leave it playing on repeat and just get it. Where other films make good background flicks because they contain so many familiar conventions, Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright’s film does that, just consciously.
Best background for: Practicing your deadly martial arts.
Worst background for: Measuring your penis.
2. Pride and Prejudice (or really anything Jane Austen)
There is really only one question at stake: Will she get the guy? And it’s Jane Austen, so you know she will, it’s just a matter of giggling incessantly and/or hiding your glee every time you see Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy on screen together.
Best background for: Catching up on your domestic responsibilities, such as ironing and embroidering cushions and shit.
Worst background for: Practicing that Sex Pistols cover with your band.
1. The Lord of the Rings
The best part of The Lord of the Rings as a background movie is, if you have the extended edition DVDs, it is perfectly customizable to however long you want to spend doing whatever it is you need to do. If you want to dedicate an entire Saturday plug in the whole trilogy. Just have a few hours, last disc of Return of the King. Easy. And it has everything that makes a great background film: familiar archetypes and story structures, extensively referenced in pop culture, long-drawn out scenes and storylines, and epic battle sequences for when you want to be distracted for ten or twenty minutes. Perfect.
Best background for: Almost anything.
Worst background for: Maintaining consciousness after that concussion.













I’m ignoring here those people in the back of the room shouting “It revived the zombie movie for the 21st century!” Yes, it did. I’m not arguing with you. I’m just saying that it will be remembered for its comedy, not its horror. In one fell swoop, it immediately rendered the flat, childish humour of the “Frat Pack” moot and outdated (to me at least, even though some people still find Ben Stiller funny). It was the signal of a changing tide. Though still full of bodily fluids, it was not a gross-out flick. Shaun of the Dead ushered in the new era of postmodern comedy: intelligent, self-reflexive, intertexual, of course, bloody hilarious.


Anchored by brilliant performaces by Daniel Day-Lewis and Paul Dano, There Will Be Blood stands apart from its time and place. It’s easy to see Daniel Plainview as the postmodern Charles Foster Kane; as both Anderson and Welles show us a man achieving all the highest material values of his society, while succumbing to the lowest human weaknesses. It is simultaneously the story of one man’s ascent and descent through entrepreneurial success and emotional failure, the story of the multi-faceted goods and evils of the American Dream, and especially the more intricate allegory for the western world’s ruthless exploitation of others in the name of oil. Adapted from portions of Upton Sinclair’s excellent novel Oil!, the new title says it all: “there will be blood…” not only in the course in this story, but for as long as the story of oil is told.



Ah, The Lord of the Rings. The epic to end all epics. Cinema experienced a resurgence in the epic genre during the nineties and early noughties, which really culminated in LOTR. Can you think of anything more epic or more recent? Nothing can top it.
Not the traditional leading hero, (that honour would go to Orlando “Legolas” Bloom) Captain Jack is indeed the heart and soul of the Pirates movies, and you’ll be hard-pressed to find anyone who disagrees with you. Why else would Disney being flogging this dead horse with
If you think these are two characters, you clearly didn’t watch the movie hard enough. In the relationship/conflict between the Narrator and Tyler Durden, we see the wonderful dichotomy between “good” guy and “bad” guy that exists in every antihero played out in the most literal sense. In the anarchy and violence espoused by Tyler Durden we see a dangerous violence void of humanity – made frightening by an extreme lack of regard for other people and no concern for the consequences. He is balanced by the Narrator, who questions Durden; who cannot escape his own morality despite his disillusionment with the world around him. The cognitive dissonance between the two personifications of this character pulls us in but frightens us: you identify with his disillusionment but fear his instability. At what point does a freedom fighter become a terrorist?
An antihero in the most Miltonic sense, Bateman is an actual serial killer – but not even a killer with a misguided sense of morality like, say, Dexter Morgan. Bateman is remorseless and chilling. What makes a character like Patrick Bateman resonate so well, and prove so cultish, is the pure essence of everything he personifies. With the wonderful hindsight we now enjoy, what self-respecting individual these days is not repulsed by the ego-driven, Reagonomics, “greed is good” ethos of the 1980s? The antihero of Brett Easton Ellis’s novel (and Mary Harron’s film) should satisfy conservatives and liberals alike as he literally takes a sharp knife to everything yuppie.
Scarlett O’Hara has stood out for seventy years as one of the most interesting characters – female or not – Hollywood has ever produced. Charming, wealthy, resourceful but rich, spoiled, selfish and vain, Scarlett may have her family’s best interests at heart, but still she steals her sister’s man, and steps on many others in her pursuit of her goals. The fact that she stands as the sole woman on this list, argues three points: 1. The lack of good female roles in Hollywood, 2. Very few anti-heroes are women, and thus 3. Anti-heroes are indeed the most enduring characters.
Alex is really only one step shy of Patrick Bateman in terms of treachery, and that’s only really because his body count is lower. Let’s face it, Alex is only really an antihero because he’s the protagonist, but in essence, he’s just an out-and-out villain. Robbery, rape, Beethoven – just a usual day’s galavanting. He’s frightening in the same way Bateman is: he’s a psychopath. Remorseless and cruel, he finds sheer delight in torture and he knows full well just what a horrible human being he is. But what is it that about him that people connect with? Why do you always see at least one person dressed as Alex every Halloween? How do we feel sympathy for someone like this when he is cured of his violence? Is it the irony in the forced violence of the cure? Is there something about Alex – and this kind of antihero – that possesses a kind of freedom we can never have?
The tortured vigilante of Scorsese’s Palme D’Or winner presents an interesting moral dilemma, as most vigilantes not riding in a van with Mr. T tend to do. Bickle fits all the aforementioned tropes of an antihero: he feels he is trying to do good in a corrupt world; yet, he slowly becomes corrupted during his quest; and he is iconic of post-Vietnam disenchantment. His protection of a teenage prostitute is honourable…and his killing spree…? Well, that’s a little more ambiguous, isn’t it? Is it honourable because of Bickle’s rationalization of it, or is it a commentary on society that we can somehow find honour in murder?
There are very few falls from grace as iconic as Michael Corleone’s. Perhaps a very strong part of what makes The Godfather Part II such a compelling sequel (the only one ever to win the Oscar for Best Picture) is that we see Corleone fully transitioned from hero to antihero. Like the true slowly corrupted good guy, he becomes what he was so originally set against: an execution-ordering mafia don. From the kiss of death for his own brother to watching his daughter killed in front of his eyes, it’s pretty clear: crime doesn’t pay.
I’ve always loved Michael Keaton. My childhood crush on Batman not withstanding, he’s always been an excellent character actor and Beetlejuice is the pinnacle of his career – there’s simply no more to it. I firmly believe that this character is the reason for Tim Burton’s career: it was the surprising success of Beetlejuice that gave Burton Batman and everything that followed. Beetlejuice is a little like Jack Sparrow, only you’re pretty sure he’s a bad dude. He frequents brothels, tries to marry an underage girl, and is generally tricksy and mischievous… and charming as hell, despite the creepy teeth. Say his name three times. Go on, I dare you.
It’s going to be interesting to see how time handles Paul Thomas Anderson’s epic. Its literary quality far outstrips its potential for a cult following, but every character Daniel Day-Lewis touches proves iconic. Daniel Plainview is the essence of There Will Be Blood, and any lesser actor could not have brought the required charm, sensibility, or deep-seeded cold-hearted ambition together in a way that was anything but a retread of the classic ambition-leads-to-downfall story arch. Anderson and Day-Lewis create a character that so fantastically blends together a million different themes and methods that, rather than being hit over the head with moralising, you get a pure, instinctive sense of the many things a man like Plainview makes you feel: fear, disgust – yet acceptance. An antihero par excellance, Daniel Plainview works on so many levels. He is far more charming than Michael Corleone or Patrick Bateman, but it’s this charm that makes you simultaneously admire and despise him. You want to trust him so badly, but have that strange nagging that you shouldn’t. He is so wonderfully realized but we’re never entirely sure what makes him tick or why.
Not only did Welles’s masterpiece change the face of film for every other reason in the book, but it also presented us with one of the first truly great antiheroes. Modelled not-so-subtly on William Randolph Hearst, Citizen Kane follows the life of Charles Foster Kane from financially lacking child to billionaire a- -hole. We see his career pass from strident idealism to selfish greed; moving from kindness and compassion to cruelty and loneliness. His dying word of “Rosebud” frames the story, as we seek to understand its meaning over the course of his life. Kane’s professional ascent mirrors his personal descent, as we learn the golden truth: his dying thought was one of nostalgia and regret for his youth, as simple, loving, and poverty-stricken as it was. Titling his film “citizen” Kane, Welles seems to strike at that deepest chord of the antihero: it could be any one of us.